Skip to main content

Judge's Notebook: Action Fizzling

Many of you have heard that an action can "fizzle," but what is that because it's not in the rulebook.

Fizzle: A Definition

Since Vampire: The Eternal Struggle and Magic: The Gathering were siblings, the DCI governed the rulings and competitive play for both games.  Fizzle started off as a term in Magic for a spell that resolved without effect, and was brought into VTES via rulings.

Fizzle does not appear in the rulebook, but the slang, semi-official term is in the rulings.  The earliest reference to it is in RTR-19960221 actually contains no definition of the term.  However, it's not until RTR-20010711 that we have a definition in VTES: the action "fizzles" (resolves with no effect).

How Did We Get Here?

If an action does not meet all requirements at resolution, the action will fizzle.

  • The acting vampire no longer has enough blood to pay for the action (Govern the Unaligned with 0 blood)
    • Note that the acting vampire must have been able to pay for the action to declare it.  This usually means the acting vampire spent too much blood on action modifiers to resolve the action without fizzling.
  • The target of the action is missing (Entrancement on a War Ghoul that burns itself to burn a location)
  • The target is no longer in the correct state
    • Target is unlocked when it needs to be locked (target plays Deep Ecology when rushed with Nose of the Hound)
    • Target is locked when it needs to be unlocked (target of Mind Numb plays Babble to unlock another minion)
    • Target is no longer in torpor (target of a diablerie attempt moves to the ready region via Warsaw Station)
  • The card providing the action is
    • No longer in play (Camera Phone burned in combat and the acting vampire plays Momentary Delay)
    • No longer usable by the acting minion (Talbot's rush stymied by Peacemaker B)

There are certainly many more examples that we can come up with, but I tried to provide the most general categories for action fizzling with examples.

The Outcome

Fizzled actions have no effect, but are successfully resolved.  This means:

  • The action cost is paid (or as much of it as can be paid is paid)
  • The action produces no effect
  • The action has reached resolution and is now bound by "no repeat actions," if applicable
  • Action modifiers and reactions that are "only usable after action resolution" are playable, if their conditions can be met
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Watchlist

We know the BCP has a watchlist for cards that are under review for banning/nerfing.  With the upcoming changes to Ashur Tablets and Emerald Legionnaires announced, but not detailed, I thought I take a few minutes to talk about some cards that I feel are problematic in the game.  I'll forego any talk about the upcoming changes. (I don't know what they are and any more talk about those cards at this point is just tilting at windmills.) My Watchlist This probably isn't my full list, but it's what is on my top of mind right now, which means they're important enough to remember that I have problems with them and important enough to think about what we need to do about it. Veil of Darkness A card that Black Chantry must be concerned about because it wasn't even reprinted in Echoes of Gehenna. The effect is powerful, a permanent chance to cancel cards.  There may be some problem with the effect, which is never going to be applied evenly.  Some decks run more Master ca
2 comments
Read more

The V5-Only Format

The idea of a V5-only format has been floated by BCP for some time.  Ideally, this is a way to level the playing field for newer players.  Some folks have, of course, lost their collective minds about the idea.  More ways to play VTES and easier formats to bring in new players sounds exactly like what the doctor ordered to me. Steve has been running several online tournaments this year, a subset of which were in the V5-only format.  I wasn't able to make his earlier V5-only events, but was able to make this last one.  Here are my thoughts about it.  Is V5-only worthwhile?  Let's find out. What I Played I had a few ideas that I wanted to experiment with: Queen Anne + obf/pre Princes, using Banishment (she's one of the oldest vampires available); Malk voters; Banu voters; and Nos Barons.  I'm glad that I didn't pick either of the first two as both of those showed up in the event.  I've previously won with a Banu deck focusing
2 comments
Read more

Thoughts on the 2024 Tournament Season Updates

BCP recently announced errata and changes for this years tournament rules to coincide with the Ravnos, Salubri, and Tzimisce starter release date.  The new cards and the changes will be tournament legal on February 2, 2024. The Errata We knew this was coming as Black Chantry announced that there would be an announcement.  I even stirred up some controversy by posting some changes I'd like to see now that these have been settled.  That being said, here's my initial thoughts regarding these changes. Ashur Tablets As much I would have preferred BCP to ban Ashur Tablets, this is the errata that I expected them to settle on.  I had considered this approach several years ago before BCP began testing changes.  It seems to be a solid middle ground that guts MMPA decks without necessarily gutting other decks that use Tablets.  The Ashur race is now much more of a race.  Gone are the days of 18+ Tablets decks.  I expect decks to sit in the 6, sometime
2 comments
Read more