Skip to main content

Crypt Construction: Accidents Happen

This past weekend I was able to participate in my first live Vampire: The Eternal Struggle event in over a year.  It was a great experience both seeing friends that I haven't seen in a long time and getting back to normal.  While I had a successful day at the tournament, securing a victory, my crypt draws ended up being less good than I had hoped.

It's Why We Play the Game

Yep, we shuffle and play.  We don't run statistics and measure odds via some computer simulation.  On the day of the event, we draw our cards and, for better or worse, we get what we get.  As I mentioned in previous blogs on crypt construction, our goal is to design a crypt that will perform as we expect on the day of the event, giving us the best chance for success.

Here's the crypt that I played:

Crypt (13 cards; Capacity min=2 max=7 avg=4.222222)
5x Luke Fellows                7 CEL OBF PRO            Gangrel antitribu:4
1x Morrow the Sage             6 cel vic OBF PRO        Gangrel antitribu:4
1x Alex Camille                5 cel for obf PRO        Gangrel antitribu:5
1x Synner-G                    5 pro CEL OBF            Gangrel antitribu:5
1x Jeffrey Mullins             4 cel OBF                Gangrel antitribu:4
1x Skulk                       4 ani OBF                Nosferatu antitribu:5
1x Lubomira Hradok             3 OBF                    Nosferatu antitribu:5
1x Old Neddacka                2 obf                    Nosferatu antitribu:4
1x Denette Stensen             2 obf                    Gangrel antitribu:4

As you can see, I am using the 5/13 approach that I recommended for star vampire decks.  I have 90+% chance of getting at least one copy of Luke Fellows in my opening draw.  This deck design also leverages my use of Powerbase: Zürich, so every other vampire is unique and there is a chain of vampires that I can use to allow the other older vampires help bring out the younger ones.

Luke Fellows was not in my opening crypt draw in either of the two preliminary rounds.  In fact, I decrypted once in each game and my fifth vampire wasn't Luke either.  There's a 62.5% chance that the fifth vampire would have been Luke Fellows, since we're now doing one draw at a time, we can use a straight odds calculation.  Using cumulative draw odds there was less than 5% chance of this one game.

In the finals, I drew two copies of Luke Fellows in my opening crypt draw.  At least he showed up when it mattered most.

Plan B

Any deck should have a Plan B.  For this deck, Plan B involves getting the largest vampire and the smallest vampire in play.

In round two, I had Morrow the Sage and Lubomira Hradock come up.  The smaller vampire was able to get the Edge and the larger one was able to make more vampires with Powerbase: Zürich.  I was able to get a small horde of vampires in play and work successfully without getting the star.  Was the deck as good?  Of course not, but it was good enough.

Final Thoughts

Good deck building will only get you so far on the day of an event.  Things can and will go wrong.  Being adaptable to the game state, like bad draws or the table dynamics, can help you take what's good on paper and make it good in practice.

Best of luck to you with your deck designs and games.


  1. Great win, Karl. Plans B and C are important to have in one's back pocket.

  2. With 13 crypt cards, if you don't get the 5x star in initial draw, the chance to get it on additional (5th) draw is 5/9 = 55,56%, not 62.5% (that would be 5/8 with 12 crypt cards).


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Watchlist

We know the BCP has a watchlist for cards that are under review for banning/nerfing.  With the upcoming changes to Ashur Tablets and Emerald Legionnaires announced, but not detailed, I thought I take a few minutes to talk about some cards that I feel are problematic in the game.  I'll forego any talk about the upcoming changes. (I don't know what they are and any more talk about those cards at this point is just tilting at windmills.) My Watchlist This probably isn't my full list, but it's what is on my top of mind right now, which means they're important enough to remember that I have problems with them and important enough to think about what we need to do about it. Veil of Darkness A card that Black Chantry must be concerned about because it wasn't even reprinted in Echoes of Gehenna. The effect is powerful, a permanent chance to cancel cards.  There may be some problem with the effect, which is never going to be applied evenly.  Some decks run more Master ca

The V5-Only Format

The idea of a V5-only format has been floated by BCP for some time.  Ideally, this is a way to level the playing field for newer players.  Some folks have, of course, lost their collective minds about the idea.  More ways to play VTES and easier formats to bring in new players sounds exactly like what the doctor ordered to me. Steve has been running several online tournaments this year, a subset of which were in the V5-only format.  I wasn't able to make his earlier V5-only events, but was able to make this last one.  Here are my thoughts about it.  Is V5-only worthwhile?  Let's find out. What I Played I had a few ideas that I wanted to experiment with: Queen Anne + obf/pre Princes, using Banishment (she's one of the oldest vampires available); Malk voters; Banu voters; and Nos Barons.  I'm glad that I didn't pick either of the first two as both of those showed up in the event.  I've previously won with a Banu deck focusing

Thoughts on the 2024 Tournament Season Updates

BCP recently announced errata and changes for this years tournament rules to coincide with the Ravnos, Salubri, and Tzimisce starter release date.  The new cards and the changes will be tournament legal on February 2, 2024. The Errata We knew this was coming as Black Chantry announced that there would be an announcement.  I even stirred up some controversy by posting some changes I'd like to see now that these have been settled.  That being said, here's my initial thoughts regarding these changes. Ashur Tablets As much I would have preferred BCP to ban Ashur Tablets, this is the errata that I expected them to settle on.  I had considered this approach several years ago before BCP began testing changes.  It seems to be a solid middle ground that guts MMPA decks without necessarily gutting other decks that use Tablets.  The Ashur race is now much more of a race.  Gone are the days of 18+ Tablets decks.  I expect decks to sit in the 6, sometime