Skip to main content

Fall of London: Toreador

This series will review the new cards in the upcoming Fall of London set. Today, we'll go over the new Toreador, revealing all of them. Thanks to BCP for allowing me to share these with you.

Regina Blake

We'll start with a new Toreador mid-cap.


First, thing she has no Celerity whatsoever.  I'm not sure that's problematic.  Toreador only really care about Celerity for Resist Earth's Grasp stealth or if they're a gun-combat deck.  More A for group 6 Toreador, which has been seriously lacking.  More R for the group, which seems highly focused on it already.


This could be an interesting special to build around.  There are a lot of locations that cost pool whose cost can be defrayed with her special.  She's Toreador so the Art Museum is an obvious choice to have in decks with her.  Creepshow Casino is another popular choice for Toreador decks.  Given her A, any of the media locations are also good choices.


Regina is an excellent vampire to slot into Toreador vote decks.  She can push votes and use Voter Captivation at superior to gain blood and give you pool.  She offers more bounce support in a grouping that has not had much A.  Nothing earth-shattering her, but she'll find a place in just about any of the Catalina Vega decks.

Given her lack of Celerity, she's not the best choice for blocking decks.  She offers no combat control, but if a .44 Magnum or Sniper Rifle can keep your meta at bay, then she's an excellent addition to that package.  Her special is more likely to have an effect in blockier decks that want to use permanents to gain the upper hand.  There's possibly some interesting overlap with Matthew and locations.  Perhaps a blocking deck featuring a lot of media outlets?  Being able to pass out intercept so you don't have to block yourself is also useful.

Rose Abawi

Another no-Celerity Toreador.


Is this a Minister I see before me?  Rose is an interesting vampire for the Toreador.  With o she has the ability to bypass the typical Toreador problem of being unable to generate stealth.  She can vote and push it with r, but stealth-bleeding is also a thing.  The a is fine, but you want A in a 4-cap for weenie Auspex.  At best she's going to chump-block an important action using Auspex bounce at inferior.


A very conditional special that will never arise.  While this provides nice flavor for the game, Rose has so little in common with Mithras that you're never going to take advantage of the extra bleed.  Better than nothing I guess.


She doesn't have a lot of fellow Toreador who share o to really make a clan-based deck, so you're most likely looking to mix her with other clans.

The Ministry and the upcoming Ravnos both have or.  We know the Ministry is Anarch now and I'm unsure where the Ravnos will land.  The pre-V5 Ministry are also workable, being mostly Independent with a few Sabbat in the relevant groupings.  She could easily be a support vampire for any stealth-bleed or stealth-vote decks in that grouping.  Her access to complimentary sect cards is the drawback.

Going Anarch is easy enough though balancing making Anarchs with having native Anarchs can be problematic.  I find Twilight Camp is always useful for mixed cases and The Red Question is a burn-option that can feed Powerbase: Los Angelese.  She's too small to do much useful with the Anarch sect toys, however.  She needs to be a 5-cap to use Fee Stakes or Reckless Agitation.

So, I expect we'll see her mostly bleeding at stealth.  Here's she's unlikely to roll with the new Ministers who will want to play Platinum Protocol.  There's use for her in non-Baali unnamed decks.

I'll be interested to see where she pops up first in the TWDA.  I like her just not in Toreador deck designs.


Popular posts from this blog

My Watchlist

We know the BCP has a watchlist for cards that are under review for banning/nerfing.  With the upcoming changes to Ashur Tablets and Emerald Legionnaires announced, but not detailed, I thought I take a few minutes to talk about some cards that I feel are problematic in the game.  I'll forego any talk about the upcoming changes. (I don't know what they are and any more talk about those cards at this point is just tilting at windmills.) My Watchlist This probably isn't my full list, but it's what is on my top of mind right now, which means they're important enough to remember that I have problems with them and important enough to think about what we need to do about it. Veil of Darkness A card that Black Chantry must be concerned about because it wasn't even reprinted in Echoes of Gehenna. The effect is powerful, a permanent chance to cancel cards.  There may be some problem with the effect, which is never going to be applied evenly.  Some decks run more Master ca

The V5-Only Format

The idea of a V5-only format has been floated by BCP for some time.  Ideally, this is a way to level the playing field for newer players.  Some folks have, of course, lost their collective minds about the idea.  More ways to play VTES and easier formats to bring in new players sounds exactly like what the doctor ordered to me. Steve has been running several online tournaments this year, a subset of which were in the V5-only format.  I wasn't able to make his earlier V5-only events, but was able to make this last one.  Here are my thoughts about it.  Is V5-only worthwhile?  Let's find out. What I Played I had a few ideas that I wanted to experiment with: Queen Anne + obf/pre Princes, using Banishment (she's one of the oldest vampires available); Malk voters; Banu voters; and Nos Barons.  I'm glad that I didn't pick either of the first two as both of those showed up in the event.  I've previously won with a Banu deck focusing

Thoughts on the 2024 Tournament Season Updates

BCP recently announced errata and changes for this years tournament rules to coincide with the Ravnos, Salubri, and Tzimisce starter release date.  The new cards and the changes will be tournament legal on February 2, 2024. The Errata We knew this was coming as Black Chantry announced that there would be an announcement.  I even stirred up some controversy by posting some changes I'd like to see now that these have been settled.  That being said, here's my initial thoughts regarding these changes. Ashur Tablets As much I would have preferred BCP to ban Ashur Tablets, this is the errata that I expected them to settle on.  I had considered this approach several years ago before BCP began testing changes.  It seems to be a solid middle ground that guts MMPA decks without necessarily gutting other decks that use Tablets.  The Ashur race is now much more of a race.  Gone are the days of 18+ Tablets decks.  I expect decks to sit in the 6, sometime